While discussing Thussu’s “Approaches to Theorizing
International Communication”, someone in class asked for a real-life, concrete
example of the theories he covered. I too was curious, and then I realized
there was an example right in our backyard, in the Caribbean country of Haiti. Haiti
has deep-rooted political, economical, and developmental issues that I will
briefly examine through the lens of dependency theory, cultural imperialism,
and structural imperialism.
Central to dependency theory is the idea that transnational
corporations in the North control every aspect of global markets, strengthening
the dominance of developed nations and contributing to the growing inequality
between the North and the South; Thussu refers to this as a “neocolonial
relationship”. Haiti’s long history of
poverty, political instability, developmental challenges, and dependency on
countries of the North can be traced back to when it was under the colonial
ruling of France. After gaining its independence from France over 200 years
ago, it became dependent on the US; today, it still relies heavily on foreign
aid. Cultural aspects of dependency theory lead us to Herbert Schiller’s
cultural imperialism and the flow of western content to the developing world. “Commercial
interests, highly influenced by Western military and political interests, of
transnational corporations undermine the cultural autonomy of the South and
created dependency on communication and media in developing countries.” Haiti
has a staggeringly high percentage of imported goods from foreign countries,
especially from the US, which prevent domestic markets, and self-sustenance, from
ever maturing. Many of these imports, by extension, promote a “foreign” lifestyle, which Schiller would argue undermines the country’s traditional values.
What would happen to Haiti if economic ties between those foreign nations were
severed?
One critique of cultural imperialism is its lack of
consideration for the role of national elites in maintaining the “development
of underdevelopment”. Norwegian
sociologist Johan Galtung proposed structural imperialism as a response. Political
and economic domination is structured so that “there exists in the countries of the South a dominant elite whose
interests coincide with the interests of the elite in the developed world. This
'core' not only provides a bridgehead by which the centre nation can maintain
its economic and political domination over the periphery nation, but is also
supported by the centre in maintaining dominance over its own internal
periphery”. When reflecting on Haiti’s issues, one must surely consider
the elites who, through violent and dishonest means, have gained political
power and oppressed the population in pursuit of their own interests, usually
monetary gains, or working alongside the US government to fulfill its own
interest, for example, in Haiti’s strategic geographical location. Corrupt governments, especially the
dictatorship of Francois Duvalier, remained in power for as long as they did by
controlling/restricting the flow of information throughout the country,
reinforcing their power and influence. Galtung maintains that these
“unrepresentative elites” benefit from the “dependency syndrome”.
This is by no means an exhaustive look into the
multidimensional problems of Haiti.
Please let me know if you’re looking for a article writer for your site. You have some really great posts and I feel I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d absolutely love to write some material for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please send me an email if interested. Thank you!
ReplyDeleteinterfon casa