Governance of the media is a hot
button issue among American’s, many Americans believe the media should be an independent
entity free of regulation. This belief mainly
stems from the divisive interpretation of the First Amendment, and its guaranteed
freedom of speech and expression from the interference government. However, according to Siochru and Girad, it is
also a responsibility of the media to aid in, “expressing, celebrating , sustaining
and evolving diverse cultures and groups within society” (Siochru & Girard,
Introduction to National Media Regulation). Although we are granted freedom of
speech, it is also necessary to inculcate within society awareness and
celebration of all its diverse members.
With the minimal regulations in
place today we are still failing to meet one of the primary tenants of the
media, the celebration of the diverse groups within society. As of today, “women
make up only 3% of mainstream media, but account for 50% of the population and only
20% of news articles are about women, and
many of these stories are of violence
and victim hood” ( Missrepresentation.org). Although women make up 50% of the population
they are disproportionally depicted in media. This leaves media consumers with
a skewed perception of the actual role of women. As well as unrealistic ideals of the role of
women and minority groups. As long as
groups are underrepresented and portrayed in stereotypical roles in the media,
America will remain stagnated in its fight towards equality for all individuals.
A fight that if won will spur progress
for all citizens.
Media regulation may infringe upon the right
of free speech by attempting to compel the media to represent all individuals in society, but this infringement upon of our First Amendment right is a necessary evil. The regulation of this aspect of the media helps create a more tolerant society that accepts all individuals and their differences.
Vanessa-thanks for a great post. You present an interesting argument and POV in saying that media has a sort of social responsibility in "expressing, celebrating , sustaining and evolving diverse cultures and groups within society" and that media regulation would somewhat sponsor this notion. I'd like to ask your opinion on how this would apply or if it should apply to user-generated media? We continue to find that user-generated media consistently proves to be influential in more than several ways,whether negatively or positively. how would this regulation apply, if it even would? This brings up an interesting point in light of the recent responses to the anti-Islam video. Would be great to hear your thoughts.
ReplyDelete-Gaby