Tuesday, October 9, 2012


Governance of the media is a hot button issue among American’s, many Americans believe the media should be an independent entity free of regulation.  This belief mainly stems from the divisive interpretation of the First Amendment, and its guaranteed freedom of speech and expression from the interference government.  However, according to Siochru and Girad, it is also a responsibility of the media to aid in, “expressing, celebrating , sustaining and evolving diverse cultures and groups within society” (Siochru & Girard, Introduction to National Media Regulation). Although we are granted freedom of speech, it is also necessary to inculcate within society awareness and celebration of all its diverse members.  
With the minimal regulations in place today we are still failing to meet one of the primary tenants of the media, the celebration of the diverse groups within society. As of today, “women make up only 3% of mainstream media, but account for 50% of the population and only  20% of news articles are about women, and  many of these stories are of violence and victim hood” ( Missrepresentation.org).  Although women make up 50% of the population they are disproportionally depicted in media. This leaves media consumers with a skewed perception of the actual role of women.  As well as unrealistic ideals of the role of women and minority groups.  As long as groups are underrepresented and portrayed in stereotypical roles in the media, America will remain stagnated in its fight towards equality for all individuals.  A fight that if won will spur progress for all citizens.
 Media regulation may infringe upon the right of free speech by attempting to compel the media to represent all individuals in society, but this infringement upon of our First Amendment right is a necessary evil. The regulation of this aspect of the media helps create a more tolerant society that accepts all individuals and their differences. 

1 comment:

  1. Vanessa-thanks for a great post. You present an interesting argument and POV in saying that media has a sort of social responsibility in "expressing, celebrating , sustaining and evolving diverse cultures and groups within society" and that media regulation would somewhat sponsor this notion. I'd like to ask your opinion on how this would apply or if it should apply to user-generated media? We continue to find that user-generated media consistently proves to be influential in more than several ways,whether negatively or positively. how would this regulation apply, if it even would? This brings up an interesting point in light of the recent responses to the anti-Islam video. Would be great to hear your thoughts.
    -Gaby

    ReplyDelete